- From: Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernandez@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:52:27 +0100
- To: Yang Squared <yang.square@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Dear Yang, I'd not recommend you not to use an information resource as the identifier of your resource. Then, according httpRange-14, you don't need to perform such redirection between the different representations of your resource. Of course might be useful to link them, but that depends on each concrete format; for instance, from HTML to RDF you could use a meta tag on your markup. Cheers, On 17 February 2012 03:19, Yang Squared <yang.square@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have an Web architecture question here. > > Assume I have a information resource URI http://example.com/homepage.html > > I would like to publish a RDF metadata > (http://example.com/data/homepagerdf) about this information resource (e.g. > homepage isCreatedBy steve). What publishing mechanism can I use? > > since http://example.com/homepage.html is an Information Resource, when > dereferencing it, we should get that homepage.html document returned. How > can we possible redirect to a RDF? > > Content negotiation can use to serve two different representation of the > resource, but both representation is for the same resource. So we cannot use > it. > > 303 can redirect one information resources to another information resource, > e.g. http://example.com/homepage.html > --303--> http://example.com/data/homepagerdf --200-->RDF > > but in this way, when I dereferencing the > original http://example.com/homepage.html it did not result as a > homepage.html itself and got a RDF. So there is a paradox here. > > Can anyone please suggest anything? Or the conclusion is that the RDFa (or > by using the link element to RDF) is the only way to publish RDF metadata > for information resources? > > I am writing a paper and I would like to conclude that there will be no case > that a hashURI publishing mechanism and 303 redirection can be used for > Information Resource to publish RDF metadata. Do you have any object case? > > > ------------------------------ > One may recommend me to use RDFa. However, I consider that the RDFa is not > ideal solution to publish Linked Data at all. > First of all, embedding metadata together with data prohibits the > independent curation of data and metadata. Secondly, following the > principles of the Web Architecture, any distinct resource of significance > should be given a distinct URI, but in this approach a single URI is used to > identify two information resources. In general, the RDFa embedded metadata > approach can be replaced by using the <link> element href in XHTML to > pointing to an external RDF document, where the rel=”meta” attribute can be > used to indicate a relationship between resources. > > Thanks a lot, > Yang Yang > > ----------------------------------- > > Web and Internet Science > > Room 3027 EEE Building > > Electronics and Computer Science > > University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ > > > Tel: +44(0)23 8059 8346 > > twitter: @yang_squared > > -- Sergio Fernández CTIC - Technological Center Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Gijón C/ Ada Byron, 39 Edificio Centros Tecnológicos 33203 Gijón - Asturias - Spain Tel.: +34 984 29 12 12 Fax: +34 984 39 06 12 E-mail: sergio.fernandez@fundacionctic.org http://www.fundacionctic.org Privacy Policy: http://www.fundacionctic.org/privacidad
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 07:53:17 UTC