Hello Richard > All in all, almost half of the vocabularies used in LOD are not meeting a > minimal quality requirement : be published at their namespace. > > Now, if there was a list of these, annotated with some stats (used in how > many datasets? occurring in how many triples?), then we could start at the > top of the list, and sort it out with the various publishers involved. > Indeed! That's the purpose of what I started in the Gdocs ... I just sent you edition rights :) That is a work we have already started with Pierre-Yves inside the LOV ecosystem : ping the vocabularies curators when they rely on non-such-reliable namespaces (either their own ones, or the ones of vocabularise they re-use but don't maintain). The objective being to augment the overall quality of the vocabulary ecosystem, one vocabulary at a time :) It is a patient but important task. You're welcome to participate. It is actually 80% social and 20% technical :) Best Bernard -- *Bernard Vatant * Vocabularies & Data Engineering Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 Skype : bernard.vatant Linked Open Vocabularies <http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov> -------------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca** ** * 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France www.mondeca.com Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 10:45:10 UTC