- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:58:04 +0000
- To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Cc: Sören Auer <auer@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>, pedantic-web@googlegroups.com
On 2 Feb 2012, at 23:58, Bernard Vatant wrote: > More than 60 [vocabularies] are either 404, time out or access denied, which does not come as a surprise, but is nevertheless a big issue. It means that data using those vocabularies are relying on semantics no one can check. > > The rest is de-referencable, but to various types of resources more or less close to one or several vocabularies, but not published following good practices, in a word not in a LOV-able state. > > All in all, almost half of the vocabularies used in LOD are not meeting a minimal quality requirement : be published at their namespace. Now, if there was a list of these, annotated with some stats (used in how many datasets? occurring in how many triples?), then we could start at the top of the list, and sort it out with the various publishers involved. Best, Richard
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 09:58:32 UTC