- From: John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:13:07 -0400
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Trying to prune this a bit... >> Or, at least, why can't ISO manage a DOI-equivalent space that would >> rein-in bogusly-long URIs, make them more manageable, and perhaps more >> functional e.g. CrossRef's Linked Data-savvy DOI proxy >> <http://bit.ly/HcStYl> > > Yep, that would do the job certainly. Hmmm... unless Crossref could mint > URIs out of, say, ISO/IEC 5218:2004 ?? ISO could do something like, http://www.iso.org/iso/ie/5218_2004 (or whatever) They could then back-end that as appropriate, minimally re-directing to the bogusly-long-URL version, but better source metadata via conneg (which is what CrosRef is now doing). -- John S. Erickson, Ph.D. Director, Web Science Operations Tetherless World Constellation (RPI) <http://tw.rpi.edu> <olyerickson@gmail.com> Twitter & Skype: olyerickson
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 15:21:32 UTC