- From: John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:14:13 -0400
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Typo..correction below... On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:13 AM, John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com> wrote: > Trying to prune this a bit... > >>> Or, at least, why can't ISO manage a DOI-equivalent space that would >>> rein-in bogusly-long URIs, make them more manageable, and perhaps more >>> functional e.g. CrossRef's Linked Data-savvy DOI proxy >>> <http://bit.ly/HcStYl> >> >> Yep, that would do the job certainly. Hmmm... unless Crossref could mint >> URIs out of, say, ISO/IEC 5218:2004 ?? > > ISO could do something like, http://www.iso.org/iso/ie/5218_2004 (or whatever) ISO could do something like, http://www.iso.org/iso/id/5218_2004 (or whatever) (note correction; "id" denites identifier space) > > They could then back-end that as appropriate, minimally re-directing > to the bogusly-long-URL version, but better source metadata via conneg > (which is what CrosRef is now doing). > > -- > John S. Erickson, Ph.D. > Director, Web Science Operations > Tetherless World Constellation (RPI) > <http://tw.rpi.edu> <olyerickson@gmail.com> > Twitter & Skype: olyerickson -- John S. Erickson, Ph.D. Director, Web Science Operations Tetherless World Constellation (RPI) <http://tw.rpi.edu> <olyerickson@gmail.com> Twitter & Skype: olyerickson
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 15:14:47 UTC