- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:31:22 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- CC: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 6/17/11 3:11 PM, Leigh Dodds wrote: >> I just had to go and check whether Amazon reviews and Facebook >> comments actually do have their own pages. That's because I've never >> seen them presented as anything other than objects within another >> container, either in a web page or a mobile app. So I think you could >> argue that when people are "linking" and marking things as useful, >> they're doing that on a more general abstraction, i.e. the "Work" (to >> borrow FRBR terminology) not the particular web page. > > You have to apply context to your statement above. Is the context: WWW > as an Information space or Data Space? These contexts can co-exist, but > we need to allow users context-switch, unobtrusively. Thus, they have > to co-exist, and that's why we have to leverage what the full URI > abstraction delivers. As stated earlier, it doesn't mean others will > follow or understand immediately, you need more than architecture for > that; hence the need for a broad spectrum of solutions that do things > properly. > and UX challenges, indeed if the ux was addressed first for the functionality, then whatever was implemented could be webized and standardized - could be a good way to force innovation in this area.
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 20:32:20 UTC