- From: Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:20:54 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
Hi, On 6/17/2011 4:11 PM, Leigh Dodds wrote: > Hi, > > On 17 June 2011 14:04, Tim Berners-Lee<timbl@w3.org> wrote: >> >> On 2011-06 -17, at 08:51, Ian Davis wrote: >>> ... >>> >>> Quite. When a facebook user clicks the "Like" button on an IMDB page >>> they are expressing an opinion about the movie, not the page. >> >> BUT when the click a "Like" button on a blog they are expressing they like the >> blog, not the movie it is about. >> >> AND when they click "like" on a facebook comment they are >> saying they like the comment not the thing it is commenting on. >> >> And on Amazon people say "I found this review useful" to >> like the review on the product being reviewed, separately from >> rating the product. >> So there is a lot of use out there which involves people expressing >> stuff in general about the message not its subject. > > Well even that's debatable. > > I just had to go and check whether Amazon reviews and Facebook > comments actually do have their own pages. That's because I've never > seen them presented as anything other than objects within another > container, either in a web page or a mobile app. So I think you could > argue that when people are "linking" and marking things as useful, > they're doing that on a more general abstraction, i.e. the "Work" (to > borrow FRBR terminology) not the particular web page. Well, that is obviously the level where the (abstract) information resource is located (can be located), or? ;) Cheers, Bob PS: cf., e.g., http://odontomachus.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/frbr-and-the-web/ ;)
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 14:22:45 UTC