- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:56:27 +0100
- To: Patrick Logan <patrickdlogan@gmail.com>
- Cc: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
> Would it be reasonable to use http://schema.rdfs.org rather than > http://schema.org in the URIs? Essentially mirror what one might hope > for schema.org to become. Then if it does become that, link the two > together? I would not exclude the possibility that Schema.org will, sooner or later, serve other representations than HTML from their URIs. In this sense, I'd opt for keeping the original URIs. However, I agree - for now, I'd like to focus on the part that you call 'mirror what one might hope for schema.org to become'. Fancy contributing, Patrick? ;) Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 7 Jun 2011, at 17:49, Patrick Logan wrote: > Would it be reasonable to use http://schema.rdfs.org rather than > http://schema.org in the URIs? Essentially mirror what one might hope > for schema.org to become. Then if it does become that, link the two > together? > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Michael Hausenblas > <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote: >>> Something I don't understand. If I read well all savvy discussions >>> so far, >>> publishers behind http://schema.org URIs are unlikely to ever >>> provide any >>> RDF description, >> >> What makes you so sure about that not one day in the (near?) future >> the >> Schema.org URIs will serve RDF or JSON, FWIW, additionally to >> HTML? ;) >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> -- >> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow >> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >> Ireland, Europe >> Tel. +353 91 495730 >> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >> http://sw-app.org/about.html >> >> On 7 Jun 2011, at 08:44, Bernard Vatant wrote: >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> Something I don't understand. If I read well all savvy discussions >>> so far, >>> publishers behind http://schema.org URIs are unlikely to ever >>> provide any >>> RDF description, so why are those URIs declared as identifiers of >>> RDFS >>> classes in the http://schema.rdfs.org/all.rdf. For all I can see, >>> http://schema.org/Person is the URI of an information resource, >>> not of a >>> class. >>> So I would rather have expected mirroring of the schema.org URIs by >>> schema.rdfs.org URIs, the later fully dereferencable proper RDFS >>> classes >>> expliciting the semantics of the former, while keeping the >>> reference to the >>> source in some dcterms:source element. >>> >>> Example, instead of ... >>> >>> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://schema.org/Person"> >>> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf- >>> schema#Class"/> >>> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Person</rdfs:label> >>> <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A person (alive, dead, undead, or >>> fictional).</rdfs:comment> >>> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://schema.org/Thing"/> >>> <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://schema.org/Person"/> >>> </rdf:Description> >>> >>> where I see a clear abuse of rdfs:isDefinedBy, since if you >>> dereference >>> the said URI, you don't find any explicit RDF definition ... >>> >>> I would rather have the following >>> >>> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://schema.rdfs.org/Person"> >>> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf- >>> schema#Class"/> >>> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Person</rdfs:label> >>> <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A person (alive, dead, undead, or >>> fictional).</rdfs:comment> >>> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://schema.rdfs.org/Thing"/> >>> <dcterms:source rdf:resource="http://schema.org/Person"/> >>> </rdf:Description> >>> >>> To the latter declaration, one could safely add statements like >>> >>> schema.rdfs:Person rdfs:subClassOf foaf:Person >>> >>> etc >>> >>> Or do I miss the point? >>> >>> Bernard >>> >>> 2011/6/3 Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> >>> >>> http://schema.rdfs.org >>> >>> ... is now available - we're sorry for the delay ;) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Michael >>> -- >>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow >>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >>> Ireland, Europe >>> Tel. +353 91 495730 >>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >>> http://sw-app.org/about.html >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Bernard Vatant >>> Senior Consultant >>> Vocabulary & Data Integration >>> Tel: +33 (0) 971 488 459 >>> Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com >>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>> Mondeca >>> 3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France >>> Web: http://www.mondeca.com >>> Blog: http://mondeca.wordpress.com >>> ---------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 08:56:56 UTC