- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:19:56 +0100
- To: Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Patrick, > So, perhaps one day it will be a standard, but not today. Good catch! Did you join the Pedantic Web [1] group, yet? We need more people like you. > Hope you are nearing a great weekend! Yes, indeed, I plan to go to DERI FAWM now and allow my brain to be off-line till 15:00 UTC tomorrow, in case anyone cares ... Cheers, Michael [1] http://pedantic-web.org/ -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 22 Jul 2011, at 16:11, Patrick Durusau wrote: > Michael, > > On 7/22/2011 10:42 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >> >>>>> >>>>> Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover >>>>> once >>>>> the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C >>>>> VoID document) is widely adopted. >>>> >>>> greed. But it's not a 'trick'. It's called a standard. >>> >>> Is it? >> >> Yes, I think that RFC5785 [1] can be considered a standard. Unless >> you want to suggest that RFCs are sorta not real standards :P >> > RFCs can be standards, but there is a path by which RFCs become > standards. > > As of today, the RFC 5785 header reads "PROPOSED STANDARD." > > So, perhaps one day it will be a standard, but not today. > > Hope you are nearing a great weekend! > > Patrick > > >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5785 >> -- >> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow >> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >> Ireland, Europe >> Tel. +353 91 495730 >> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >> http://sw-app.org/about.html >> >> On 22 Jul 2011, at 15:39, Dave Reynolds wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 09:59 +0100, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >>>> Frans, >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>>> Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover >>>>> once >>>>> the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C >>>>> VoID document) is widely adopted. >>>> >>>> greed. But it's not a 'trick'. It's called a standard. >>> >>> Is it? >>> >>> There was me thinking it was a Interest Group Note. >>> >>> Is there a newer version than: >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/NOTE-void-20110303/ >>> >>> ? >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > Patrick Durusau > patrick@durusau.net > Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 > Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) > Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 > Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) > > Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net > Homepage: http://www.durusau.net > Twitter: patrickDurusau > >
Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 15:20:27 UTC