- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:16:48 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
> It was the the claim that /.well-known/void is "a standard" that I was > surprised by. It's the sort of thing that could easily be on a Rec > track > somewhere, I just wasn't aware of it. Sorry if I somehow gave the impression that VoID is a W3C Recommendation. I would consider it as a de-facto standard in the Linked Data community. Formally, though it is a W3C Note, yes. Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 22 Jul 2011, at 16:12, Dave Reynolds wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 15:42 +0100, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover >>>>> once >>>>> the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C >>>>> VoID document) is widely adopted. >>>> >>>> greed. But it's not a 'trick'. It's called a standard. >>> >>> Is it? >> >> Yes, I think that RFC5785 [1] can be considered a standard. Unless >> you >> want to suggest that RFCs are sorta not real standards :P > > :) > > I'm aware that /.well-known is standardized in RFC5785. > > It was the the claim that /.well-known/void is "a standard" that I was > surprised by. It's the sort of thing that could easily be on a Rec > track > somewhere, I just wasn't aware of it. > > FWIW I'm perfectly happy with VoID's current status as an Interest > Group > note. > > Cheers, > Dave > >> On 22 Jul 2011, at 15:39, Dave Reynolds wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 09:59 +0100, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >>>> Frans, >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>>> Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover >>>>> once >>>>> the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C >>>>> VoID document) is widely adopted. >>>> >>>> greed. But it's not a 'trick'. It's called a standard. >>> >>> Is it? >>> >>> There was me thinking it was a Interest Group Note. >>> >>> Is there a newer version than: >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/NOTE-void-20110303/ >>> >>> ? >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >> > >
Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 15:17:17 UTC