- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:59:40 +0100
- To: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Frans, > I had a quick look. But I could not find it. I had a closer look now > and I see the URI probably is http://dbpedia.org/void/Dataset. I > have tried it. Redirection to either HTML or RDF seems to be in > place. HTML request lead to http://dbpedia.org/void/page/Dataset, > which shows a table of VoID properties. The RDF redirection (to http://dbpedia.org/void/data/Dataset.rdf) > does not seem to work, I get an error. Sorry, you lost me here. Did you curl it or how did you get your findings? > Apart from the error, somehow this is not what I expected. I assumed > that the dataset URI is the URI of a dataset. It is the key to all > other data. If you want something from a dataset, you only need to > know this URI. So why is the dataset URI hard to find? Why isn't it > used when references are made to DBpedia? Why isn't it the same as > the base URI (http://dbpedia.org)?. <http://lod-cloud.net/dbpedia> a void:Dataset; foaf:homepage <http://dbpedia.org/>; Says everything, or? > Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover once > the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C > VoID document) is widely adopted. Agreed. But it's not a 'trick'. It's called a standard. Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 22 Jul 2011, at 09:42, Frans Knibbe wrote: > On 2011-07-21 16:27, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >> >> >>> But is this really common practice nowadays? Take DBpedia for >>> example. What is the URI of the DBpedia dataset? Is it http://dbpedia.org? >>> That does not seem to resolve to a set of metadata. >> >> Did you have a look at the URI I gave you? I mean http://lod-cloud.net/void.ttl > I had a quick look. But I could not find it. I had a closer look now > and I see the URI probably is http://dbpedia.org/void/Dataset. I > have tried it. Redirection to either HTML or RDF seems to be in > place. HTML request lead to http://dbpedia.org/void/page/Dataset, > which shows a table of VoID properties. The RDF redirection (to http://dbpedia.org/void/data/Dataset.rdf) > does not seem to work, I get an error. > > Apart from the error, somehow this is not what I expected. I assumed > that the dataset URI is the URI of a dataset. It is the key to all > other data. If you want something from a dataset, you only need to > know this URI. So why is the dataset URI hard to find? Why isn't it > used when references are made to DBpedia? Why isn't it the same as > the base URI (http://dbpedia.org)?. > > Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover once > the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C > VoID document) is widely adopted. > >> >> BTW, some 30% [1] of the LOD cloud datasets are using VoID ... >> >>> Is there a general way of obtaining datasets URIs? >> >> Not to my knowledge. We're working on it in LATC [2] - Keith? >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> [1] http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/lodcloud/state/#data-set-level-metadata >> [2] http://latc-project.eu/ >> >> -- >> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow >> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >> Ireland, Europe >> Tel. +353 91 495730 >> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >> http://sw-app.org/about.html >> >> On 21 Jul 2011, at 15:19, Frans Knibbe wrote: >> >>> >>> Thanks for the replies. It seems that there is agreement that a >>> dataset should have a URI and that dereferencing that URI should >>> return metadata about the dataset. That is good to know. >>> >>> But is this really common practice nowadays? Take DBpedia for >>> example. What is the URI of the DBpedia dataset? Is it http://dbpedia.org? >>> That does not seem to resolve to a set of metadata. >>> >>> Is there a general way of obtaining datasets URIs? >>> >>> I can imagine an RDF dataset comprising all known dataset URIs. >>> And of course that dataset will have a URI itself. Does such a >>> dataset exist at the moment? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Frans >>> >>> >>> On 2011-07-21 12:35, Frans Knibbe wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have just placed a Linked Data dataset online and now I am >>>> struggling with finding the best way to publish the metadata of >>>> the dataset. I wonder if there are best practices for referencing >>>> a dataset and its metadata, and for linking the two. >>>> >>>> I did find out that using the Vocabulary of Interlinked Data >>>> (VoID) is a good way to publish the metadata of a dataset. But I >>>> still need some guidance. I have come up with three questions: >>>> >>>> 1) Is it common practice/recommendable to regard a dataset a >>>> resource? If it is, then all datasets should have a URI, right? >>>> 2) If having a dataset URI is a good thing, what should be behind >>>> the URI? Should dereferencing the URI lead to the dataset >>>> metadata (a VoID file for example)? >>>> 3) If dereferencing a dataset URI leads to the dataset metadata, >>>> should there be separate HTML and RDF versions of the metadata? >>>> Or is it better to have a HTML page with embedded (RDFa) RDF data? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance for your help, >>>> Frans >>> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 09:00:21 UTC