W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > July 2011

Re: Ontology license info

From: Keith Alexander <k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:03:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJrtwV4W4c0mgFLUOrcKHTP52bbVjy=nnkZL6WBErMtzj=Kphg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Daniel O'Connor" <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com>
Cc: valentina presutti <vpresutti@gmail.com>, public-lod@w3.org

Is an ontology a software project, a creative work, or data ?
Is the intention to license the use of the terms, the triples of the
ontology, or the reproduction of the documentation?
There is also the dcterms:license property to point to a license.
Maybe it is most useful if most ontologies have no restrictions to
use, in which case waiving rights might be more appropriate than
licensing them http://vocab.org/waiver/terms/.html


On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Daniel O'Connor
<daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:53 PM, valentina presutti <vpresutti@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>> I could not find any suggestion of good practices for attaching a license
>> to an ontology.
>> Of course one can report it on its documentation (for humans), but I was
>> wondering if there is any diffuse practice for embedding this info in the
>> ontology as a property value (for machine readability).
>> Any suggestion?
> Didn't creative commons  provide a means to solve this a little bit; as well
> as the DOAP method also mentioned?
> http://wiki.creativecommons.org/License_RDF
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 12:04:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:21:14 UTC