Re: DBpedia: limit of triples

On 8/9/11 6:38 AM, Leigh Dodds wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9 August 2011 11:26, Jörn Hees<j_hees@cs.uni-kl.de>  wrote:
>> ...
>> I also guess it would be better to construct the given document first from the outgoing triples, maybe preferring the ontology mapped triples, and then incoming links up to a 2000 triples limit (if necessary to limit bandwidth).
>> That would fit the description in the above mentioned section way better than the current implementation.
> You could also try a mirror to see if that provides better facilities, e.g. [1]
>
> Cheers,
>
> L.
>
> [1]. http://beta.kasabi.com/dataset/dbpedia-36
>

Leigh,

Can you share a SPARQL URL to the mirror above that addresses the 
question posed? Seriously, I would very much like to explore such a 
SPARQL URL.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen

Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2011 12:52:57 UTC