- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 18:30:59 -0400
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, Anja Jentzsch <anja@anjeve.de>, public-lod@w3.org, Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>, Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray@okfn.org>, info@okfn.org
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > > All, > > See: http://www.ckan.net/group/lod > > Why: Linking Open Data? > > It should be: Linked Open Data . Or just: Linked Data (bearing in all the data sets might not be open). The name and description goes back the SWEO interest group, which was called that. If you take the "open" out of it (which I would oppose) then I don't think you should reference the interest group, since their interest was in "open". http://esw.w3.org/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData -Alan
Received on Sunday, 5 September 2010 22:31:48 UTC