- From: KangHao Lu (Kenny) <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 19:39:02 +0900
- To: ML public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <7099300E-FE51-48FB-8F22-B51DCABBA7B3@csail.mit.edu>
On 2010/05/16, at 5:00, Nathan wrote: > Toby Inkster wrote: >> On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:53:50 +0100 >> Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: >>> I'm wondering if there are any recommended paths for migrating RDF >>> or specifically an ontology from slash to fragment URIs (?) >> Cool URIs don't change. Indeed. But several reasons we might want a canonical way to change URIs: - Slash URI requires more HTTP round trips - For documents we have 301 - I personally don't like this owl:sameAs culture. Try to use only one URI for each thing could encourage cross domain links TimBL uses the term http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/contact# and has """ tim:i con:preferredURI "http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card#i". """ in his FOAF. I think this can be generalized and it shouldn't be con:preferredURI but something like link:preferredURI. For example, foaf:maker and dc:creator are considered equivalent in the FOAF spec. So in the RDF ontology of FOAF, maybe there should be """foaf:maker link:preferredURI "http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator". """ in the ontology. Any thoughts? Cheers, Kenny
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 10:39:50 UTC