- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:07:40 -0400
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- CC: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Danny Ayers wrote: > On 20 March 2010 21:18, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > >> All, >> >> I continue to struggle with easy discovery of Government oriented Linked >> Data (UK and U.S. are examples). Basically, a long time ago, we established >> some core principles for Linked Open Data published to the Web. The >> components where broken down as follows: >> >> 1. Publish RDF Data Set archive URLs to a well known location -- >> http://esw.w3.org/DataSetRDFDumps >> 2. Publish SPARQL Endpoints -- e.g., <http://esw.w3.org/SparqlEndpoints> >> 3. Publish Linked Data -- an home page or deeply linked URI will do. >> > > I suspect (and hope) 1 & 2 are redundant if you have 3. > Yes, if #3 provides pointers to #1 & #2. > >From what I've heard from the w3c eGov list and bits of offlist chat, > it's still early days for getting government data out there. There > seems to be a lot of momentum, but right now it's directed towards > local issues, getting data into a Web-friendly form (I hate to use the > term "legacy", but a lot of the time it does seem to apply - the > source material is buried in a spreadsheet or even a pdf document). > Getting the stuff translated & exposed, linked into the rest of the > world (beyond just shared vocabs) will be phase 2 I expect. > > >> DBpedia still provides a very nice template for the above. >> > > Absolutely. > > It's worth noting that for the gov depts to maintain credibility, that > provenance information should be associated with any data exposed - a > minor technical hassle, in most cases likely fulfilled by manual > annotation. (see the Open Provenance Model, if I understand being > RDFized in data.gov.uk http://openprovenance.org/). > > Yes, certainly ! > A related issue (that Jeni Tennison has raised) is the question of > authority over the statements. I believe she has the right idea, that > to link gov data into e.g. dbpedia, intermediary graphs are necessary, > to ring fence the levels of commitment between the national, > centralised expression of "facts" and those other facts we know and > love from the social-web world. > I think this applies to anything that references DBpedia but not created by the core project members. If you recall, there have been a number of DBpedia linksets (see the mailing list archives) from across the LOD community that we've loaded into the DBpedia instance, using distinct graph IRIs etc.. > >> Unfortunately, most of the Govt oriented Linked Data projects haven't quite >> adopted the scheme above thereby making the process of discovering items 1-3 >> quite tedious. >> > > Your impatience is understandable, but from what I can gather, things > are progressing... > > I only get demonstrably impatient when the message (easily perceived as a marketing message) gets out of sync with the actual deliverables. Linked Data is about LINKs, so whenever there is talk of Linked Data there should be a LINK in place to materialize the value prop. of a given Linked Data Space. The LINK in question should really be a conduit to SPARQL endpoint, Data Set URLs etc., since value prop. imbibers are going to be varied -- naturally. >> Suggestions: >> >> I think we can tackle this problem by doing the following: >> >> 1. Use the moniker Linked Open Govt Data (LOGD) for all Govt. oriented >> Linked Data projects >> > > Where? A good idea in principle, but we don't really yet have the > material in place to justify a shared e.g. mailing list. > > This is just about reference, no different to saying: LOD. >> 2. Use #hashtag #logd on Twitter and "logd" for tagging on del.cio.us -- one >> data is on del.icio.us or Twitter, its basically part of LOD via RDFizers >> etc.. >> > > That sounds reasonable. Anything that can help human discovery can't > hurt machine discovery. > > That's basically my point :-) Kingsley >> So Far I have: >> >> 1. http://delicious.com/kidehen/logd -- del.icio.us tag >> > > good-o > > Cheers, > Danny. > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Sunday, 21 March 2010 18:08:13 UTC