- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 01:33:06 +0000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Aldo Bucchi <aldo.bucchi@gmail.com>
- CC: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi. On 08/03/2010 01:15, "Kingsley Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > Aldo Bucchi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> All countries have a National Identification Number scheme ( NIN ). >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_identification_number >> >> Also, all countries have code points in different schemes. >> >> So, can't we combine both to create a de-facto URI for people based on >> country ids? >> >> For example: http://dbpedia.org/nin/cl/14168212 >> That would be me based on my Chilean NIN. >> >> Is there some namespace for this already? >> > Don't use DBpedia namespace in this manner. > > Why not encourage people to do this: > > urn:country.person.id.{national-id} Although superficially a nice idea, for me the answer to your question would be that it would not longer be Linked Data. Design Issue Number 2 (http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html) says: "Use HTTP URIs so that people can look up those names." I wholeheartedly agree with this statement. doi, urn suck. It is hard to work out what they mean (resolve), and even if I can it is not a distributed (web) system. But I do agree that subverting dbpedia for this would not be a good thing to do. Maybe okkam or another project/company wants to step into the gap? Best Hugh > > The data can then live in an RDF store that can make de-referencable > URIs via re-write rules when it comes to the Linked Data publishing. > This also means the data can ultimately live in a place controlled by > the Chilean govt. without much hassle, when its ready etc.. >> When you have real world problems, like we have now in Chile, it is >> simple solutions like these that would make integration easier. >> > Yes, but do it right from the onset as per tip above :-) > > Kingsley >> For example, we have assigned a NS for chilean IDs. But some of the >> missing people here are tourists and we the only IFP we have is their >> national ID ( not emails ). >> >> Thx, >> A >> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 8 March 2010 01:33:48 UTC