- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 20:24:12 +0200
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > Q: What about OpenID? > > A: The WebID Protocol embraces and extends OpenID via the WebID + OpenID That's an unfortunate turn of phrase. The intent I assume is to suggest that there are ways in which the two approaches can be used together, and ways in which they quite reasonably take differing approaches. When they differ, it's through genuine and transparent differences rather than industry mischief. The "embrace and extend" phrase is rather too closely associated with cynical manipulation of partial compatibility for commercial advantage. I suggest avoiding it here! >From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend_and_extinguish ""Embrace, extend and extinguish,"[1] also known as "Embrace, extend, and exterminate,"[2] is a phrase that the U.S. Department of Justice found[3] was used internally by Microsoft[4] to describe its strategy for entering product categories involving widely used standards, extending those standards with proprietary capabilities, and then using those differences to disadvantage its competitors." [...] "The strategy and phrase "embrace and extend" were first described outside Microsoft in a 1996 New York Times article entitled "Microsoft Trying to Dominate the Internet,"[5] in which writer John Markoff said, "Rather than merely embrace and extend the Internet, the company's critics now fear, Microsoft intends to engulf it." The phrase "embrace and extend" also appears in a facetious motivational song by Microsoft employee Dean Ballard,[6] and in an interview of Steve Ballmer by the New York Times." I think we're doing something quite different here! cheers, Dan
Received on Sunday, 11 July 2010 18:24:45 UTC