Re: Subjects as Literals

On 6 July 2010 13:34, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
> Danny Ayers wrote:

>> :Jo rdfs:value "Jo"
>>
>> together with
>>
>> :Jo rdf:type rdfs:Literal
>>
>> ?
>
> 1: is there and rdfs:value? (rdf:value)

My mistake, it is rdf:value

> 2: I would *love* to see rdf:value with a usable tight definition that
> everybody can rely on

It's certainly usable, but the definition is about as open as it could be:

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#rdfvalue

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_value

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#rdfValue

...in fact it rather resembles a bnode in the property position.

Cheers,
Danny.

-- 
http://danny.ayers.name

Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 04:48:45 UTC