- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:34:59 +0100
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- CC: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>, Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Ross Singer <rossfsinger@gmail.com>, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Danny Ayers wrote: > I've been studiously avoiding this rat king of a thread, but just on > this suggestion: > > On 2 July 2010 11:16, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachmann@trialox.org> wrote: > ... >> Serialization formats could support >> >> "Jo" :nameOf :Jo >> >> as a shortcut for >> >> [ owl:sameAs "Jo"; :nameOf :Jo] >> >> and a store could (internally) store the latter as >> >> "Jo" :nameOf :Jo >> >> for compactness and efficiency. > > what about keeping the internal storage idea, but instead of owl:sameAs, using: > > :Jo rdfs:value "Jo" > > together with > > :Jo rdf:type rdfs:Literal > > ? 1: is there and rdfs:value? (rdf:value) 2: I would *love* to see rdf:value with a usable tight definition that everybody can rely on Best, Nathan
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2010 11:35:50 UTC