- From: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:01:07 +0000
- To: Ross Singer <rossfsinger@gmail.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Ross Singer <rossfsinger@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Dan. Simon Spero pointed me towards this as well (so I would > like to publicly thank him, too). > > My takeaway is that both parties are doing something wrong here: > > 1) My parser needs to be aware of the context of the resource it is > parsing (whether that be the URI it is being retrieved from or an > explicitly set base URI) - I'm refactoring it as we speak to take this > into account. Yes, it also the case for most FOAF files in the wild (and I suppose lots of other RDF documents). > 2) The BBC should set an xml:base attribute since that would alleviate > any ambiguity should the RDF not be retrieved from their site. > Nope, xml:base would only be a valid answer if we were linking to something like 'some/path'. Cheers, y
Received on Thursday, 28 January 2010 21:01:41 UTC