- From: Damian Steer <d.steer@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:24:29 +0000
- To: Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
On 14 Jan 2010, at 12:04, Richard Light wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm developing my nascent Turtle parser, and working through the Turtle examples [1]. Since my objective is to generate RDF from the parsed Turtle source, I need guidance on whether to implement Collections (test 07) as a linked list of blank nodes, as suggested by the output from test 07, or by the rather nicer rdf:parseType="Collection" construct given in the RDF Primer [2]. If your parser is simply converting turtle to rdf/xml the latter is fine, I suppose. However the point of an rdf parser is to produce triples, and producing the linked list is what I'd expect. Damian
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 12:25:41 UTC