- From: Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:20:38 +0000
- To: Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
In message <g6kg+URVhwTLFwoJ@light.demon.co.uk>, Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk> writes > >I'm developing my nascent Turtle parser, and working through the Turtle >examples [1]. Since my objective is to generate RDF from the parsed >Turtle source, I need guidance on whether to implement Collections >(test 07) as a linked list of blank nodes, as suggested by the output >from test 07, or by the rather nicer rdf:parseType="Collection" >construct given in the RDF Primer [2]. Follow-up question: if I did want to use the rdf:parseType="Collection" construct in my RDF/XML output, how would I do so for the example given, where the collection is a collection of strings? @prefix : <http://example.org/stuff/1.0/> . :a :b ( "apple" "banana" ) . Richard -- Richard Light
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 12:21:20 UTC