- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:13:43 -0400
- To: open-graph-protocol@googlegroups.com, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
All, One of the cool things that came out of yesterday's opengraph schema enhancements was the mapping to DBpedia's ontology. Naturally, the effects of this aren't obvious if you can't even view the ontology etc.. Here is a link that shows the effect of TBox meshups: BTW -- do note that the UMBEL project [2] was always about this kind of meshup. Now if you follow my TBox meshup, you will note that the DBpedia and UMBEL ontologies aren't directly connected, but once you get to OpenCyc (by following-your-nose) the connection manifests. Conclusion: As the lights really begin to brighten re. Linked Data, you will begin to see a lot more of what's be talked about in the past but not fully comprehended or appreciated. For instance, these mapper schemas/ontologies lay the foundation for optional "context rules" that make Linked Data meshes much more coherent and navigable (i.e., adding CLASSiness [3]) Links: 1. http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fopengraphprotocol.org%2Fschema%2FActor -- explore the what TBox mappings can deliver 2. http://umbel.org -- early mapping scheme effort 3. http://bit.ly/dk0yvu -- old post about CLASSiness shot to DBpedia (note: the queries reflect older DBpedia incarnations). -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 14:14:11 UTC