- From: Vasiliy Faronov <vfaronov@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:07:41 +0400
- To: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ian Davis <lists@iandavis.com>, Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>, Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>
Peter Ansell wrote: > If there was an annotation, there should be an equivalency > relationship defined to the original URI, so Y would link back to X, > and Z would link back to Y, and possibly X. But if Y and Z are for two independent annotations of X, should they link to each other? If yes, I don't see how really different this is from linking X to the documents containing the annotations (rdfs:seeAlso). Both ways rely on some publisher(s) being willing to link to some extraneous data. Moreover, in the X-only case, only the original authority needs to do that, whereas in the many-URI case, we need multiple links all over the place to connect the annotations to each other and make them discoverable. If no, then neither Y nor Z are discoverable from anywhere in the LD web, and there's no need to mint these URIs in the first place. -- Vasiliy Faronov
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 10:08:28 UTC