- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:50:26 +0200
- To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
2009/9/25 Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>: > On Friday 25. September 2009 10:15:34 you wrote: >> sorry if I sound negative, I reckon the semweb is a done deal now, the >> many-eyeballs arrived. > > Thanks for asking the right questions, Danny, I believe it is critical for > the success that someone does! Thanks, but I'm not even sure they are the right questions. >> but - where should we take it? > > What I'd like to do with it, is to solve problems for people when combining > data sets that are cannot be solved by conventional means, i.e. today the > number of people who are interested in a particular combination of datasets > goes down whereas the cost generally goes up, so it doesn't scale. Yes, but please bear with me now - do we have to wait for another generation arriving on the Web? There must be ways we can kick-start this stuff. > I think there is a critical piece of technology that is missing in our > arsenal, namely a (free software) programming stack that makes a large > group of developers, who are likely to have little prior understanding of > semweb, to go "yeah, I can do that". Like bengee's ARC2 stack - PHP? > I think the work done by the Drupal folks is a right step in this > direction, for the kind of stuff that people use a CMS for. But I think > that we also need a stack, probably built around the MVC pattern, that can > be used for more generic purposes. Absolutely. If we can re-use existing patterns we can get people involved. > I haven't got anywhere with my ideas on this topic though... Me neither :) I should insert a Star Trek quote here, but can't think of one. Cheers, Danny. -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Friday, 25 September 2009 20:51:06 UTC