- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:26:19 -0400
- To: rick <rick@rickmurphy.org>
- CC: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-lod@w3.org
rick wrote: > Danny & All: > > Of course there's been a lot of work on this subject over the years. > You can find one nice piece on analogical reasoning here [1]. > > But for linked data to become useful it's important to refine our > understanding of web architecture beginning with the language of > resources. I'm currently working up a piece for my blog on this topic. > Stay tuned. Amen re. resources! information and non-information resource terminology is only second to RDF/XML re. historic impediments to comprehending essence of Semantic Web Project vision. > > That being said, I have recommended that the US and UK governments > engage in creating a Linked Data roadmap. One essential element of > that road map would include a lifecycle for how linked data publishers > and linked data consumers could work towards the goals of linked data > without the oversight of a directed authority. > > 1. http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/analog.htm > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:26:57 UTC