- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:28:14 -0400
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Toby Inkster wrote: > On 1 Sep 2009, at 08:23, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote: > >> All individual item URIs, e.g. >> >> http://products.semweb.bestbuy.com/products/8182593/semanticweb.rdf >> >> should be dereferenceable and return a RDF/XML representation with >> the proper media type. > > > But the RDF obtained by dereferencing that URI includes: > > xml:base="http://products.semweb.bestbuy.com/semanticweb.rdf" > > which means that the actual product URI ends up as: > > http://products.semweb.bestbuy.com/semanticweb.rdf#Offering_8182593 > > When fetching that, you get a 404. > All, Martin should have said: BestBuy is now publishing RDF/XML :-) Linked Data meme deployment is coming, of course. Stay tuned. On an orthogonal note re. BestBuy and other Linked Data publishing endeavors, HTML+RDFa is the way to go re. default metadata representation (esp. if you prefer # based HTTP URIs as identifiers for your entities / data objects / resources). Basically, RDF/XML needs to continue its journey to the lower echelons of the Linked Data value pyramid (sooner rather than later). -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 20:28:54 UTC