W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2009

Re: [pedantic-web] dealing with attachments / images..

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:33:31 +0000
Message-ID: <4B13D7BB.6020308@webr3.org>
To: pedantic-web@googlegroups.com
CC: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Antoine,

Thanks indeed :-) that's answered pretty much all my ontology finding
related questions! - and good of you to see right to the root cause of
my problem.

Regards,

Nathan

Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> Nathan, pedants,
> 
> 
> A rather general remark in reaction to your question.
> In order to find ontologies and terms of ontologies (classes,
> properties), you can use ontology search engines such as OntoSelect
> [1], Watson [2], OntoSearch [3], OntoSearch2 [4] or more general
> Semantic Web search engines such as Falcons [5], SWSE [6], Sindice [7]
> or Swoogle [8].
> One drawback of these systems is that they tend to put forward big
> ontologies that are not necessarily popular and which may not be the
> best to use for the Linked Data community.
> DERI is also working on an ontology-term-search engine, but I'm not
> sure the prototype we have is publicly available.
> 
> [1] OntoSelect: http://olp.dfki.de/ontoselect
> [2] Watson: http://watson.kmi.open.ac.uk/
> [3] OntoSearch: http://eprints.aktors.org/369/
> [4] OntoSearch2: http://www.ontosearch.org/
> [5] Falcons: http://iws.seu.edu.cn/services/falcons/objectsearch/index.jsp
> [6] SWSE: http://swse.org/
> [7] Sindice: http://sindice.com/
> [8] Swoogle: http://swoogle.umbc.edu/
> 
> When it comes to finding ontologies, Watson is pretty good. When it
> comes to finding concepts, Falcons is, AFAICT, better. For finding
> instances, SWSE is good. For finding Semantic Web documents in
> general, Sindice may be a good choice.
> I'm wondering if this should be referenced on the Pedantic Web website.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> AZ.
> 
> 
> 2009/11/30 Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Background, Ihave a sioc:Post which (when rendered as html) visually
>> contains 3 images, with captions and licenses, creators etc.
>>
>> q: how to deal with these images in rdf terms..?
>> if anybody is doing this already, please do share.
>>
>> immediate thoughts are that:
>>
>> <image>
>>        rdf:type <foaf:Image> ;
>>        rdf:type <sioc:Item> ;
>>        sioc:about <path/to/image.jpg> ;
>>        sioc:link <path/to/image.jpg> ;
>>        foaf:thumbnail <path/to/image_thumb.jpg> ;
>>        foaf:content "description of image"@en ;
>>
>> where I'm running short is how to express height/width and it there are
>> any other ontologies with a class of Image and related properties for
>> width/height etc. kinda like mrss i guess.
>>
>> regards & thanks in advance
>>
>> Nathan
>>
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 14:34:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:01 UTC