W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2009

Re: [pedantic-web] dealing with attachments / images..

From: Carlo Torniai <carlotorniai@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:25:19 -0800
Message-ID: <e62b02f40911300825v573a66fdudf015c608a8692e3@mail.gmail.com>
To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@gmail.com>
Cc: pedantic-web@googlegroups.com, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi all,
I just want to mention that there are search engines and repositories for
the bioscience domain such as:
- EBI lookup service http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ontology-lookup/
- Bioportal at the NCBO : http://bioportal.bioontology.org/
- Obofoundry: http://www.obofoundry.org/

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Antoine Zimmermann <
antoine.zimmermann@gmail.com> wrote:

> Nathan, pedants,
>
>
> A rather general remark in reaction to your question.
> In order to find ontologies and terms of ontologies (classes,
> properties), you can use ontology search engines such as OntoSelect
> [1], Watson [2], OntoSearch [3], OntoSearch2 [4] or more general
> Semantic Web search engines such as Falcons [5], SWSE [6], Sindice [7]
> or Swoogle [8].
> One drawback of these systems is that they tend to put forward big
> ontologies that are not necessarily popular and which may not be the
> best to use for the Linked Data community.
> DERI is also working on an ontology-term-search engine, but I'm not
> sure the prototype we have is publicly available.
>
> [1] OntoSelect: http://olp.dfki.de/ontoselect
> [2] Watson: http://watson.kmi.open.ac.uk/
> [3] OntoSearch: http://eprints.aktors.org/369/
> [4] OntoSearch2: http://www.ontosearch.org/
> [5] Falcons: http://iws.seu.edu.cn/services/falcons/objectsearch/index.jsp
> [6] SWSE: http://swse.org/
> [7] Sindice: http://sindice.com/
> [8] Swoogle: http://swoogle.umbc.edu/
>
> When it comes to finding ontologies, Watson is pretty good. When it
> comes to finding concepts, Falcons is, AFAICT, better. For finding
> instances, SWSE is good. For finding Semantic Web documents in
> general, Sindice may be a good choice.
> I'm wondering if this should be referenced on the Pedantic Web website.
>
>
> Regards,
> AZ.
>
>
> 2009/11/30 Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Background, Ihave a sioc:Post which (when rendered as html) visually
> > contains 3 images, with captions and licenses, creators etc.
> >
> > q: how to deal with these images in rdf terms..?
> > if anybody is doing this already, please do share.
> >
> > immediate thoughts are that:
> >
> > <image>
> >        rdf:type <foaf:Image> ;
> >        rdf:type <sioc:Item> ;
> >        sioc:about <path/to/image.jpg> ;
> >        sioc:link <path/to/image.jpg> ;
> >        foaf:thumbnail <path/to/image_thumb.jpg> ;
> >        foaf:content "description of image"@en ;
> >
> > where I'm running short is how to express height/width and it there are
> > any other ontologies with a class of Image and related properties for
> > width/height etc. kinda like mrss i guess.
> >
> > regards & thanks in advance
> >
> > Nathan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --AZ
>
>
>


-- 
Carlo
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 16:31:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:20:54 UTC