- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:57:32 +0000
- To: Herbert Van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com>
- CC: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, Georgi Kobilarov <georgi.kobilarov@gmx.de>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, "Michael L. Nelson" <mln@cs.odu.edu>, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Herbert Van de Sompel wrote: > On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:51 AM, Nathan wrote: >> Danny Ayers wrote: >>> What Damian said. I keep all my treasures in Subversion, it seems to >>> work. >>> >>> >>> >> >> 3rd that; whilst the http time travel conversation goes on - I can't >> help feeling that going down the date header route is only going to end >> up in something nobody uses; because it doesn't provide any >> implementation details to the developer, and thus nobody will adopt it. > > > Nathan, > > Isn't it a bit early in the game to make such a statement? The research > results from the memento project were just published in a paper, 2 weeks > ago. Give us a little time and we'll have implementation guidelines up > on the memento web site. And, as I indicated before, we have plans to > write this up as an I-D => RFC. > certainly is, and as mentioned off list, the sincerest of apologies; I think memento is a fascinating idea, and something that definitely needs spec'd and hopefully implemented. feeling the stress of an impending deadline, and it just so happens that some form of rdf synchronisation is needed, and thus any involvement from me was on my own private agenda of getting something client passable working for next week; not the time to be sending off emails to mailing lists - think I'll be quiet till time is free again, unless I have something useful to contribute! many regards, nathan
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 18:58:36 UTC