- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:49:02 +0000
- To: Damian Steer <d.steer@bristol.ac.uk>
- CC: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, Georgi Kobilarov <georgi.kobilarov@gmx.de>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Herbert Van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Damian Steer wrote: > On 22 Nov 2009, at 09:39, Danny Ayers wrote: > >> 2009/11/22 Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>: >>> On 20 Nov 2009, at 19:07, Chris Bizer wrote: >> [snips] >> >>> From a web architecture POV it seems pretty solid to me. Doing stuff via >>> headers is considered bad if you could just as well do it via links and >>> additional URIs, but you can argue that the time dimension is such a >>> universal thing that a header-based solution is warranted. >> Sounds good to me too, but x-headers are a jump, I think perhaps it's >> a question worthy of throwing at the W3C TAG - pretty sure they've >> looked at similar stuff in the past, but things are changing fast... > > See also http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3253 > > Subversion is a partial deltav implementation. It may well be the only deployed implementation. > surely virtuoso webdav w/ ods breifcase can be classed as a deployed implementation; unsure of status re forking etc but most of it's there and functioning v well. nathan
Received on Sunday, 22 November 2009 11:50:22 UTC