- From: François Scharffe <francois.scharffe@inria.fr>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:26:20 +0100
- To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
- CC: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, valentina presutti <vpresutti@gmail.com>, Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@cnr.it>
Hi Kjetil, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > On Friday 20. November 2009 09:37:42 François Scharffe wrote: >>> Eventually, this will evolve into a reference site with best practices >>> for each problem newcomers present, and provide a launchpad for >>> ventures beyond what's there with minimal cost. >> Sounds like www.ontologydesignpatterns.org > > Ah, great! I wasn't aware of that site. However, it doesn't quite seem to > be what I want, it seems like they are more concerned with general > patterns, not with making suggestions about specific ontologies to use. > > For example, SIOC has a Role class, that could be used for AgentRole, > Location should probably use the geonames:Feature class, etc. Yes I totally agree. Actually these entities should be indicated on the portal under fields Known Uses and References. > This Wiki doesn't make it clear to me if it is the purpose to address such > concerns. The ontology design patterns portal purpose is to collect different kind of ontology patterns: content, architectural, logical, alignment and re-engineering patterns. Content patterns are actually ontology fragments related to a particular ontology. For example if you look for a way to represent Biological Species you can access it through domains->Biology and then spot the Biological_Entities pattern [1] which is actually a piece of the FAO ontology. For the moment the portal mainly contains upper level entities, but we all put links to existing vocabularies it can quickly become very useful. Cheers, François [1] http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions:Biological_Entities > > Best, > > Kjetil
Received on Friday, 20 November 2009 15:26:15 UTC