- From: joel sachs <jsachs@csee.umbc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:37:46 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- cc: public-lod@w3.org, taxacom@mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Toby, This is awesome. We can combine this data (conservation status of 46,600 species) with the Biological Inventories of the World's Protected Areas [1] to, for example, query for the vulnerable species in each park. PREFIX purl: <http://purl.org/NET/biol/ns#> PREFIX life: <http://life.buzzword.org.uk/2009/terms/vocab#> PREFIX lifeCat: <http://life.buzzword.org.uk/2009/terms/categories#> PREFIX bioinv: <http://bioinventory.ice.ucdavis.edu/2009/elements#> SELECT DISTINCT ?population ?occurrence WHERE { ?population life:assessment ?assessment . ?assessment life:assessmentCategory lifeCat:VU . ?population life:definingTaxonomy ?x . ?x purl:name ?y . ?occurrence bioinv:latin_name ?y . } Of greater significance, we can determine which species of concern are not protected in any park. And the IUCN data should be of high utility in citizen science monitoring. Note that the above query is matching on scientific name, an imprecise heuristic. The Bioinventories database has ITIS TSNs for many, but not close to all, occurrence records. We can use the new ITIS web service [2], or maybe the SPARQL endpoint [3] to Allan Hollander's species resolver [4] to get TSNs for the IUCN data. Matching on TSNs could then be the first thing we try. When that fails, we can try to match on scientific name + authorship. My guess is that even in the best of possible LSID worlds, there will always be cases where heuristic approaches will be necessary for determining species matches. A couple of other things: 1. Have you considered putting the species name inside the URLs for the pages? This would simplify human interaction with the data; would there be a downside? 2. I notice that the URI http://life.buzzword.org.uk/2009/terms/categories#assessment does not yet exist. This, of course, does not preclude us from using it in data and queries. To me, this nicely illustrates that a URI can abdicate one responsibility (resolution mechanism), while still performing another (vocabulary term). Sincerely, Joel. 1. http://bioinventory.ice.ucdavis.edu/rdf/ , records undergoing change. 2. http://www.itis.gov/ITISWebService/ 3. http://ecoinfo.ice.ucdavis.edu/taxa/sparql 4. e.g. http://ecoinfo.ice.ucdavis.edu/taxa/Gorilla_gorilla On Thu, 21 May 2009, Toby A Inkster wrote: > On 21 May 2009, at 20:03, joel sachs wrote: > >> I'm mainly hoping for pointers to biodiversity data in RDF > > > About a month ago I started an experiment in converting the IUCN Red List to > RDF. The IUCN's data licensing policies are not entirely clear, and I've not > been able to get a good answer from them as to whether this is OK, so until I > hear differently, this data and the URLs used should be considered unstable. > (If anyone here has contacts within IUCN who could clarify things, I'd love > to hear from them.) > > Anyway, this URL represents the population of Western Gorillas: > > http://life.buzzword.org.uk/2009/populations/9404#population > > The species is: > > http://life.buzzword.org.uk/2009/populations/9404#taxonomy > > And their IUCN assessment is: > > http://life.buzzword.org.uk/2009/populations/9404#assessment > > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > >
Received on Monday, 25 May 2009 13:39:27 UTC