- From: Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:11:49 +0930
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>, public-lod@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 22:42:32 UTC
> > >> Therefore rather than deciding for either RDFa or a content-negotiated >> approach, why not do both (and provide a dump file too) >> > Exactly! > +1 Also: You can provide a translation of your rdfa<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDFa> +xhtml <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML> into normal RDF<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Description_Framework>through GRDDL <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GRDDL>. That basically means into putting a profile attribute into your <head> tag which points to a resource which says "This is how you pull out RDF from here". <head profile="http://ns.inria.fr/grddl/rdfa/"> You could provide links to an installation of Cognition or similar to extract that on the fly - http://buzzword.org.uk/swignition/grddl More at http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grddl/rdfaprimer/PrimerRDFaSection.html Zemanta <http://www.zemanta.com> helped me add links & pictures to this email. It can do it for you too. <http://www.zemanta.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 22:42:32 UTC