- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:41:46 -0400
- To: Kurt J <kurtjx@gmail.com>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
Kurt J wrote: > Hi, > > Along with Yves Raimond, George Fazekas, and Michael Smethurst I have > been charged with providing a tutorial on music and semantic web > technologies for ISMIR 2009 conference in Japan [1]. ISMIR > (International Society of Music Information Retrieval) deals with a > broad range of topics in music informatics (audio analysis, music > recommendation, etc) and the audience is generally very technology and > Web literate. > > We want to show the importance of Linked Data to the future of music > informatics research and provide some concrete examples of what can > already be done (let's say some nice music "meshups") > > We've launched a website which will contain all tutorial materials > [2]. If you have any suggestions for materials to include you can > comment on that site or on this thread. Looking forward to hearing > your ideas! > > -kurt j > > [1] http://ismir2009.ismir.net/ > > [2] http://ismir2009.dbtune.org/ > > > Kurt, Great stuff! Note, I really think we need to do away with the "Web of Data" moniker. We've had Data on the Web since inception, so we can't use what has always existed as the basis for introducing something new :-) Ironically, the same even applies to "Semantic Web" moniker. The Web has been Semantic since inception, the only issue was that scope of the Semantics. Initially it was presentation oriented (HTML) and then document structure oriented (XML). What's actually new, is a "Web of Linked Data" since RDF gives us a Data Model and associated markup languages that enable Semantics scoped to the data level (i.e., structured data). In addition, the Linked Data meme solves the problem of implicitly associating a data item with its metadata via an HTTP based Identifier (aka. HTTP URI). All: If we want to communicate outside our community, effectively, we need to really invest a little more time in how we tell the story. Misnomers like "Web of Data" and "Semantic Web" simply confuse people, and I think the track record speaks for itself re. the 10 +yr. march towards "Linked Data Web" message coherence and comprehension etc.. :-) BTW - I've used "Web of Data", "Data Web", and "Semantic Web" in the past, so I am not immune to the messaging snafus that I gripe about above. The key thing here is this: lets commit to message construction "agility" combined with perpetual reassessment messages, relative to target audience. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 14:42:27 UTC