- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:36:16 +0000
- To: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
- CC: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, "void-rdfs-internals@googlegroups.com" <void-rdfs-internals@googlegroups.com>
Simon, Thanks a lot for your comments, very much appreciated (if I gather correctly, Keith already started to reply ...). > - My questions on > <http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/issues/detail?id=19&can=1> still stand. > ;-) Sorry, my fault - seems the notification mechanism in Gcode seems not to work as expected. I've starred that issue, but after closing it I didn't get a notification - will take care. Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://sw-app.org/about.html > From: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de> > Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:52:07 +0000 > To: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org> > Subject: Re: [call for comments] voiD 1.0 > Resent-From: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:53:16 +0000 > > > Michael Hausenblas wrote: >> We are very pleased to announce the release of voiD [1]. > > Congratulations! > > My comments: > > - > <http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/source/browse/trunk/liftSSM/SSM2void.xslt> > uses void:uriPattern instead of void:uriRegexPattern and so does the example > output under <http://rdfs.org/ns/void-guide#sec_4_3_Publishing_tools>. > I really like the addition of void:uriRegexPattern! > > - I'm not so sure about the correctness of the usage of dcterms:format under > <http://rdfs.org/ns/void-guide#sec_1_5_Technical_description_features>. First, > dcterms:format requires a resources rather than a literal. Then, this would > mean that the void:TechnicalFeature *has* this format, so it would be a > document, not that it *is* that format. How about: > :DBpedia void:feature <http://dbpedia.org/resource/RDF/XML> . > > - My questions on > <http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/issues/detail?id=19&can=1> still stand. > ;-) > > - I hope there will be some alignment with SIOC in the future (see also > <http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev/browse_thread/thread/da8a2d4c1f4adf38 > /07370433943f906d?show_docid=07370433943f906d>). What I'm especially after is > using sioc:has_container instead of dcterms:isPartOf to go from the page of an > item in the dataset to the description of the dataset (which would be a > sioc:Container as well). > I think I will just do this for now (for the project I'm working on) since I'm > providing discovery via sitemap.xml anyway. > > Cheers, > Simon >
Received on Friday, 30 January 2009 08:36:58 UTC