- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:44:49 -0500
- To: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
On 1/27/09 11:31 AM, Jun Zhao wrote: > > Olaf Hartig wrote: >> On Thursday 22 January 2009 16:32:31 Tom Heath wrote: >>> Hi Olaf, >>> >>> What's your overall goal? It might be that there's another way of >>> answering your underlying question or achieving this goal than such a >>> study (which if it doesn't exist may be costly in time and money to >>> perform). >> >> I want to learn something about potential users of SQUIN and other >> linked data applications from such a kind of report. I was wondering >> whether I can even derive some requirements. >> >> Greetings, >> Olaf >> > Hi Olaf, > > I am not sure whether you only want to know the reaction to LD by > developers only. Our projects have been supporting the needs from > users who have little or no techy background. They quite buy the idea > of Semantic Web, for making it easier to mash up datasets, technically > speaking. However, we are still looking for compelling cases to show > that there are things that cannot be done without LD. And I would > really want to know what the LD community feels about how far the LD > technology is reaching outside the SW community. > > Looking forward to SQUIN:-) > > Jun > > Jun, Have you looked at: 1. http://esw.w3.org/topic/WebID - What, Why, and How of a Personal URI (how you make your WebID the conduit disparate data of relevance with in-built "Meshing" since "Mashups" should be antithetical to LD) 2. http://esw.w3.org/topic/foaf%2Bssl - addressing non-repudiatable identity using LD and SPARQL within existing SSL framework 3. http://esw.w3.org/topic/Rdb2RdfXG/StateOfTheArt - data integration across RDBMS, XML, and other Sources -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 16:45:27 UTC