- From: Peter DeVries <pete.devries@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:40:36 -0600
- To: public-lod@w3.org, dmozzherin@gmail.com
- Message-ID: <3833bf630912011740q2b6930b5s6aa45b1ad4aaf7ce@mail.gmail.com>
Hi LOD'ers, Richard Cyganiak was kind enough to suggest some fixes and changes, which you can see on the new version. http://rdf.taxonconcept.org/ses/v6n7p.rdf http://rdf.taxonconcept.org/ont/txn_doc/index.html http://rdf.taxonconcept.org/ont/void.rdf I also made another change which I would like to ask the LOD community about. I was thinking that the species itself should be a class so that individuals of that species would be instances of that class. Probably another skos:Concept class. So an individual species concept class like that for the Cougar would be an instance of a skos:Concept (SpeciesConcept) class and also be a skos:Concept class (Cougar) of it's own. Individual animals would be instances of the skos:Concept class (Cougar). This should work with OWL2 but I don't know how well it will work with the LOD. Also I created a VERY preliminary OWL document that would contain a much more complete representation of the species. My thoughts are that these OWL documents would be used to help determine what specimens are instances of what species concept. The goal would be to provide an OWL document for those who need a more complete description of what we mean by the URI, while also providing a much lighter RDF representation that could be used for concept mapping etc. However, I don't know if I am going about this in the right way. Below are my VERY preliminary examples of what these OWL documents might look like. The example has some attributes that I thought should be included in a species document, but it does not have everything that would like to eventually include. http://rdf.taxonconcept.org/owlses/v6n7p/2009-12-01.owl Doc's at http://rdf.taxonconcept.org/owlses/v6n7p/owl_doc/index.html The common classes etc, would eventually be moved to a separate ontology that would be imported into each individual species ontology. And these ontologies will need to be fixed so that they work together, I don't think they do right now. Thanks in Advance, :-) - Pete ---------------------------------------------------------------- Pete DeVries Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin - Madison 445 Russell Laboratories 1630 Linden Drive Madison, WI 53706 GeoSpecies Knowledge Base About the GeoSpecies Knowledge Base ------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2009 01:41:16 UTC