- From: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:11:01 +0100
- To: Gian Piero Zarri <zarri@noos.fr>
- Cc: Ansgar Scherp <scherp@uni-koblenz.de>, public-lod@w3.org, Gian Piero Zarri <gian-piero.zarri@univ-paris12.fr>
Hello! > I was abroad these last weeks, and unable then to follow this thread with > the necessary attention. It seems however evident to me that, when dealing > contemporaneously with terms like "ontology" and "event", one should have at > least a look at NKRL (Narrative Knowledge Representation Language). NKRL is, > in fact, a language and software environment expressly created for dealing > in a somewhat 'intelligent' way with "narratives", i.e., in practice, with > streams of (complex) events. > > To do this, NKRL makes use of two different ontologies, a 'standard' > (binary) one for dealing with 'static notions' like, among other things, > "objects and persons participating in events", and an n-ary one for > describing general classes of events like "moving an object", "making a > trip", "starting a company", "having a positive/negative attitude > for/against someone/something", "living in a place", "receiving some money", > "feeling ill" etc. Of course, NKRL is also endowed with all sort of > conceptual tools to represent temporal information and event correlations > ("connectivity phenomena"), and with high-level inference tools. Interested > people can consult my recent (Springer, 2009) book on this subject: > "Representation and Management of Narrative Information - Theoretical > Principles and Implementation", see > http://www.springer.com/computer/artificial/book/978-1-84800-077-3 or, for > an introduction, my paper at the "2009 AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent > Complex Event Processing" in Stanford. Really interesting! Just out of curiosity - the only article I could take a look at about NKRL is [1], and it doesn't seem to hold a reference to the OntoMedia work done at Southampton University - how do the two relate to each other (are they related at all?) Cheers, y [1] http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=974473 > > Regards, > > Gian Piero Zarri > University Paris-Est/Paris12 > LiSSi Laboratory > France > Email: zarri@noos.fr, gian-piero.zarri@univ-paris12.fr > > > > Ansgar Scherp a écrit : > > Dear all > > > It is quite interesting to see this very long thread on events. In the past > time > we have studied many event models (see, e.g., the list Raphael Troncy sent > around). > When studying them, I was very surprised that for many of them no > foundational > literature was studied (philosophy, linguistics, cognitive sciences, etc.). > Rather, the models seem to be developed add hoc and remain in fact quite > simple > for the always argued reason of "being generic". > > Libby Miller says, "events are difficult and complex things to model". And > we > would like to stress that fact. Indeed, getting a fully comprehensive > understanding > of what events are is very difficult and challenging. As such, a simple > model > will hardly work. In particular, when interoperability between different > systems > is needed. > > Thus, I am happy to announce that at this year's Knowledge Capturing > conference > we will present the Event-Model-F that aims filling the gap of a > comprehensive and > at the same time semantically precise event model [1]. The event model is > available > in OWL and axiomatized using DL (see older TR [2]). What I did for this > event model > is reading literature of foundational sciences and discussing the topic with > philosophers. The Event-Model-F provides comprehensive support to represent > * time and space, > * objects and persons participating in events, and > * mereological, causal, and correlative relationships between events. > In addition, the Event-Model-F provides a flexible means for > * event composition, > * modeling event causality and event correlation, and > * representing different interpretations of the same event. > > As sometimes not all of this functionality is needed, the event model is > organized > in patterns. Thus, it is easier to understand to use (just take what you > need > and the leave the rest out). > > The event model has its own webpage, where also comprehensive examples are > available, e.g., from the emergency response domain: > http://isweb.uni-koblenz.de/eventmodel/ > > Documentation of the Event-Model-F can be found in [1]. > > Finally, I would like to draw your attention to a workshop conjunct with > this > year's ACM Multimedia conference that is concerned of events as happenings > in the > real world. This is an effort done together with Ramesh Jain and Mohan > Kankanhalli. > http://www.uni-koblenz.de/confsec/eimm09/ > > > Best > > Ansgar > > [1] A. Scherp, T. Franz, C. Saathoff and S. Staab, F---A Model of Events > based on > the Foundational Ontology DOLCE+DnS Ultralight, International Conference on > Knowledge Capturing (K-CAP), Redondo Beach, CA, USA, September, 2009. > http://isweb.uni-koblenz.de/eventmodel/event-model-f-kcap.pdf > > [2] A. Scherp, T. Franz, C. Saathoff, S. Staab: A Model of Events based on a > Foundational Ontology, Technical Report of the Department of Computer > Science, > 02/2009, University of Koblenz-Landau, ISSN (Online) 1864-0850 >
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:11:43 UTC