- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:05:41 +0000
- To: François Scharffe <francois.scharffe@sti2.at>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
Francois, Thanks for your feedback and the question. Though I'm not sure what you technically mean with 'my:links is a named graph' :) I think the answer is simple: indeed we decided to model datasets and linksets independently from each other. The following example from the (not yet publicly available) voiD guide may illustrate this: Let's assume the two well-known linked datasets DBpedia and DBLP: :DBpedia void:containsLinks :DBpedia2DBLP . :DBpedia2DBLP rdf:type void:Linkset ; void:target :DBLP . So, it is a linking *from* DBpedia *to* DBLP; as RDF is a direct graph, this makes sense quite a lot (the subject 'sits' in DBpedia, the object in DBLP). IIRC, we had your option in mind as well [1] but decided to go for the current modeling due to the above reasons. Actually, as I think, the two modelings are equivalent, just with reversed directions: YOUR model (if I got it right): :dataset1 <- void:target - :links - void:target - > :dataset2 voiD model: :dataset1 - void:containsLinks -> :links - void:target - > :dataset2 Cheers, Michael [1] http://community.linkeddata.org/MediaWiki/index.php?MetaLOD#Discussion ---------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Michael Hausenblas DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland tel. +353 91 495730 http://sw-app.org ---------------------------------------------------------- François Scharffe wrote: > Hi Michael, > > thank you for the link ;) > It seems that the current voiD spec supposes that the linkset (set of > interlinks) is supposed to be included in one of the two interlinked > datasets. I think it would make sense for the linkset to be considered > independently from the two interlinked datasets, something like this: > > my:links a void:Linkset ; > void:target <dataset1> ; > void:target <dataset2> ; > > my:links is a named graph containing the set of owl:same_as links. This > would avoiD to bind a dataset with a set of links. > > Cheers, > François > > Michael Hausenblas wrote: >> >> Just to let you know. One of the outcomes of the recent VoCamps [1] >> was that we have agreed on a final layout for voiD (Vocabulary of >> Interlinked Datasets). It is now available at [2] - please note that >> the actual (final) namespace will be 'http://rdfs.org/ns/void#' ... >> can't fix everything within two days, right :) >> >> A more detailed user guide to follow soon! >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> PS: A big thanks to the Neologism (http://neologism.deri.ie/) people >> for creating such an awesome tool and John Breslin for the great >> support re rdfs.org! >> >> [1] http://vocamp.org/wiki/VoCampGalway2008#Outcomes >> [2] http://rdfs.org/ns/neologism/void >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Dr. Michael Hausenblas >> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, >> Galway, Ireland >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >
Received on Saturday, 29 November 2008 12:06:23 UTC