- From: François Scharffe <francois.scharffe@sti2.at>
- Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:16:32 +0100
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <49311680.60308@sti2.at>
Hi Michael, thank you for the link ;) It seems that the current voiD spec supposes that the linkset (set of interlinks) is supposed to be included in one of the two interlinked datasets. I think it would make sense for the linkset to be considered independently from the two interlinked datasets, something like this: my:links a void:Linkset ; void:target <dataset1> ; void:target <dataset2> ; my:links is a named graph containing the set of owl:same_as links. This would avoiD to bind a dataset with a set of links. Cheers, François Michael Hausenblas wrote: > > Just to let you know. One of the outcomes of the recent VoCamps [1] was > that we have agreed on a final layout for voiD (Vocabulary of > Interlinked Datasets). It is now available at [2] - please note that the > actual (final) namespace will be 'http://rdfs.org/ns/void#' ... can't > fix everything within two days, right :) > > A more detailed user guide to follow soon! > > Cheers, > Michael > > PS: A big thanks to the Neologism (http://neologism.deri.ie/) people for > creating such an awesome tool and John Breslin for the great support re > rdfs.org! > > [1] http://vocamp.org/wiki/VoCampGalway2008#Outcomes > [2] http://rdfs.org/ns/neologism/void > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Dr. Michael Hausenblas > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute > National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, > Galway, Ireland > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > >
Received on Saturday, 29 November 2008 10:16:21 UTC