- From: François Scharffe <francois.scharffe@sti2.at>
- Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:16:32 +0100
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <49311680.60308@sti2.at>
Hi Michael,
thank you for the link ;)
It seems that the current voiD spec supposes that the linkset (set of
interlinks) is supposed to be included in one of the two interlinked
datasets. I think it would make sense for the linkset to be considered
independently from the two interlinked datasets, something like this:
my:links a void:Linkset ;
void:target <dataset1> ;
void:target <dataset2> ;
my:links is a named graph containing the set of owl:same_as links. This
would avoiD to bind a dataset with a set of links.
Cheers,
François
Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>
> Just to let you know. One of the outcomes of the recent VoCamps [1] was
> that we have agreed on a final layout for voiD (Vocabulary of
> Interlinked Datasets). It is now available at [2] - please note that the
> actual (final) namespace will be 'http://rdfs.org/ns/void#' ... can't
> fix everything within two days, right :)
>
> A more detailed user guide to follow soon!
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
> PS: A big thanks to the Neologism (http://neologism.deri.ie/) people for
> creating such an awesome tool and John Breslin for the great support re
> rdfs.org!
>
> [1] http://vocamp.org/wiki/VoCampGalway2008#Outcomes
> [2] http://rdfs.org/ns/neologism/void
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
> Galway, Ireland
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 29 November 2008 10:16:21 UTC