- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:32:35 -0500
- To: Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>
- CC: 'Andreas Harth' <andreas.harth@deri.org>, public-lod@w3.org, dbpedia-announcements@lists.sourceforge.net, 'Semantic Web' <semantic-web@w3.org>, dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Chris Bizer wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > we for sure want to do this, but also did not want to postpone the DBpedia > 3.2 release any further. > > So be ensured that the upcoming public user interface for defining the > infobox-to-ontology mappings will include the possibility to reuse existing > classes and properties and that external classes and properties will be used > within the 3.3 release. > > Defining the infobox-to-ontology mappings that we currently have was already > a lot of work (Anja thanks again), so please be patient with the > mappings/reuse of external ontologies. > > Cheers > > Chris > Andreas, Apropos Chris' comments above, it's coming. DBpedia ontology to UMBEL ontology mapping is one of a number of mappings that will emerge in due course. That said -- by the very nature of this project and RDF based Linked Data in general -- anyone with a vested interest in the ontology mapping efforts can step in and accelerate matters. Thus, I encourage others to participate bearing in mind DBpedia 3.2's increased compatibility with such endeavors. Kingsley > > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Andreas Harth [mailto:andreas.harth@deri.org] >> Gesendet: Montag, 17. November 2008 16:55 >> An: Chris Bizer >> Cc: public-lod@w3.org; 'Semantic Web'; dbpedia- >> discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; dbpedia- >> announcements@lists.sourceforge.net >> Betreff: Re: ANN: DBpedia 3.2 release, including DBpedia Ontology and >> RDF links to Freebase >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> Chris Bizer wrote: >> >>> 1. DBpedia Ontology >>> >>> DBpedia now features a shallow, cross-domain ontology, which has been >>> manually created based on the most commonly used infoboxes within >>> >> Wikipedia >> great work! >> >> One thing: what's the reason for creating your own classes rather >> than re-using or sub-classing existing ones (foaf:Person, >> geonames:Feature...)? Same for properties (foaf:name, dc:date...). >> >> Regards, >> Andreas. >> >> -- >> http://swse.deri.org/ >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Dbpedia-announcements mailing list > Dbpedia-announcements@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-announcements > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 16:33:20 UTC