- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:26:53 +0200
- To: "Jun Zhao" <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Raimond, Yves" <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, <public-lod@w3.org>
Jun,
>I think Yves' proposal kind of hits our complexity-line.
Yes, this was kinda my feeling as well. However, Richard and/or Keith might want to add something to this as well :)
Anyways, I think it is important to gather these ideas; that's why I proposed the Wiki for it ...
Cheers,
Michael
----------------------------------------------------------
Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jun Zhao [mailto:jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 1:21 PM
>To: Hausenblas, Michael
>Cc: Raimond, Yves; public-lod@w3.org
>Subject: Re: [call for comments] voiD - vocabulary of
>interlinked datasets
>
>
>Hi Michael,
>
>I think Yves' proposal kind of hits our complexity-line. Do
>you remember
>we drew something about the complexity that voiD is aiming to solve at
>the right corner of the poster? That might give people some idea the
>sort of the complexity we want to expose in voiD "at the
>starting point" :)
>
>Yves,
>
>There is an excellent paper in ESWC by Andy Langegger. I think
>you might
>also be interested:
>
>/A Semantic Web Middleware for Virtual Data Integration on the Web
>/Andreas Langegger, Wolfram Wöß, Martin Blöchl (Johannes Kepler
>University Linz)
>
>cheers,
>
>J.
>> Yves,
>>
>> Brilliant idea! IMHO, however, I fear a bit too advanced for now ;)
>>
>> Really, I think we need something like this (and the stuff Andy
>> Langegger does), BUT let us please first focus on the simple, general
>> purpose things like stating what is in an LOD dataset and
>how/where does
>> it link to. Please DO add your proposal to the Wiki page,
>I've created a
>> section for it [1].
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Michael
>>
>> [1]
>>
>http://community.linkeddata.org/MediaWiki/index.php?MetaLOD#Ext
ensions_a
>> nd_feature_requests
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
>> Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
>> JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
>>
>> http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Yves Raimond [mailto:yves.raimond@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:16 PM
>>> To: Jun Zhao
>>> Cc: Hausenblas, Michael; public-lod@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: [call for comments] voiD - vocabulary of
>>> interlinked datasets
>>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>> http://community.linkeddata.org/MediaWiki/index.php?MetaLOD#Kic
>>>
>> k-off_mee
>>
>>>>> ting_at_ESWC08
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> Really interesting indeed :-) I am still looking for an
>effective way
>>> of describing the content of a dataset, and I came across RIRO
>>> recently, which has a part about graph patterns in RDF -
>>> http://vocab.org/riro/gpt.html (look at the other RIRO
>ontologies to
>>> put that back into context).
>>>
>>> I think this might be a bit too complex though. I also thought about
>>> the following possibility: having something like:
>>>
>>> :dataset void:example :example.
>>>
>>> where :example is a small RDF document holding an example
>of what you
>>> could find in this dataset. For example, I might have -
>>>
>>> :example {
>>> :both a mo:MusicArtist; foaf:made :rec.
>>> :rec mo:available_as :playlist.
>>> }
>>>
>>> Then, it would be easy enough to SPARQL for "datasets that
>hold music
>>> artists and related playlists".
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> y
>>>
>>>
>
>
>--
>Dr. Jun Zhao
>Image Bioinformatics Research Group
>
>Department of Zoology, University of Oxford
>South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
>E-mail: jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk
>Direct phone: +44-(0)1865-281094
>Department fax: +44-(0)1865-310447
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 11:30:48 UTC