- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:26:53 +0200
- To: "Jun Zhao" <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Raimond, Yves" <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, <public-lod@w3.org>
Jun, >I think Yves' proposal kind of hits our complexity-line. Yes, this was kinda my feeling as well. However, Richard and/or Keith might want to add something to this as well :) Anyways, I think it is important to gather these ideas; that's why I proposed the Wiki for it ... Cheers, Michael ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ ---------------------------------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: Jun Zhao [mailto:jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk] >Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 1:21 PM >To: Hausenblas, Michael >Cc: Raimond, Yves; public-lod@w3.org >Subject: Re: [call for comments] voiD - vocabulary of >interlinked datasets > > >Hi Michael, > >I think Yves' proposal kind of hits our complexity-line. Do >you remember >we drew something about the complexity that voiD is aiming to solve at >the right corner of the poster? That might give people some idea the >sort of the complexity we want to expose in voiD "at the >starting point" :) > >Yves, > >There is an excellent paper in ESWC by Andy Langegger. I think >you might >also be interested: > >/A Semantic Web Middleware for Virtual Data Integration on the Web >/Andreas Langegger, Wolfram Wöß, Martin Blöchl (Johannes Kepler >University Linz) > >cheers, > >J. >> Yves, >> >> Brilliant idea! IMHO, however, I fear a bit too advanced for now ;) >> >> Really, I think we need something like this (and the stuff Andy >> Langegger does), BUT let us please first focus on the simple, general >> purpose things like stating what is in an LOD dataset and >how/where does >> it link to. Please DO add your proposal to the Wiki page, >I've created a >> section for it [1]. >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> [1] >> >http://community.linkeddata.org/MediaWiki/index.php?MetaLOD#Ext ensions_a >> nd_feature_requests >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Michael Hausenblas, MSc. >> Institute of Information Systems & Information Management >> JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH >> >> http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Yves Raimond [mailto:yves.raimond@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:16 PM >>> To: Jun Zhao >>> Cc: Hausenblas, Michael; public-lod@w3.org >>> Subject: Re: [call for comments] voiD - vocabulary of >>> interlinked datasets >>> >>> Hello! >>> >>> >>>>> >>> http://community.linkeddata.org/MediaWiki/index.php?MetaLOD#Kic >>> >> k-off_mee >> >>>>> ting_at_ESWC08 >>>>> >>>>> >>> Really interesting indeed :-) I am still looking for an >effective way >>> of describing the content of a dataset, and I came across RIRO >>> recently, which has a part about graph patterns in RDF - >>> http://vocab.org/riro/gpt.html (look at the other RIRO >ontologies to >>> put that back into context). >>> >>> I think this might be a bit too complex though. I also thought about >>> the following possibility: having something like: >>> >>> :dataset void:example :example. >>> >>> where :example is a small RDF document holding an example >of what you >>> could find in this dataset. For example, I might have - >>> >>> :example { >>> :both a mo:MusicArtist; foaf:made :rec. >>> :rec mo:available_as :playlist. >>> } >>> >>> Then, it would be easy enough to SPARQL for "datasets that >hold music >>> artists and related playlists". >>> >>> Cheers! >>> y >>> >>> > > >-- >Dr. Jun Zhao >Image Bioinformatics Research Group > >Department of Zoology, University of Oxford >South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK >E-mail: jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk >Direct phone: +44-(0)1865-281094 >Department fax: +44-(0)1865-310447 > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 11:30:48 UTC