RE: Distinguishing between types of address (locn)

Simon, I personally don't perceive the ISO paywall different from other
paywalls. I understand that organisations have to make money to survive.
I'm just saying that, if I am required to pay this fee to be able to
participate in the discussion, I am out of here. Makx
Op 25 sep. 2015 6:51 PM schreef <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>:

> Ø  I don’t think this group can require its members to pay a fee to get
> access to relevant information
>
>
>
> Are all your journal subscriptions free? ISO’s paywall isn’t really any
> different to that. I agree that it would be nice if it was free, but its
> not the only paywall, and somehow it is perceived differently.
>
>
>
> *From:* Makx Dekkers [mailto:mail@makxdekkers.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, 25 September 2015 9:39 AM
> *To:* richard.murcott@gmail.com
> *Cc:* 'Pano Maria' <pano.maria@taxonic.com>; public-locadd@w3.org
> *Subject:* RE: Distinguishing between types of address (locn)
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> If there is an ‘international consensus’ that resolves a problem that was
> raised here, that consensus should be out in the open. If it’s not, it
> should not be part of this discussion.
>
>
>
> I don’t think this group can require its members to pay a fee to get
> access to relevant information. If it does, I’ll sign off.
>
>
>
> Makx.
>
>
>
> *From:* richard.murcott@gmail.com [mailto:richard.murcott@gmail.com
> <richard.murcott@gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* 25 September 2015 04:13
> *To:* Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
> *Cc:* Pano Maria <pano.maria@taxonic.com>; public-locadd@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: Distinguishing between types of address (locn)
>
>
>
> Re: Could Richard maybe specify what this international consensus is?
>
>
>
> It's 65pp with UML models and explanatory narrative. Would be a great
> investment Makx i.e. save time, get everyone singing from the same
> songbook. Just sorting out the semantics for the elements/characteristics
> of address is a coup. A lot of significant entities participated in
> developing this consensus, including the Universal Postal Union (UPU).
>
>
>
> Jurisdictions are publishing conforming Profiles and making these freely
> accessible. However, each will conform to selected parts of the ISO
> consensus; parts relevant to their jurisdiction address schemes. Besides,
> Profiles inherit ISO patterns by referencing the ISO model, so likely a
> reader would still need the published ISO narrative to round out
> comprehension of a Profile.
>
>
>
> It is possible to access models from the ISO/TC211 model repository
> <http://www.isotc211.org/hmmg/HTML/root.html>, but the models (typically)
> are devoid of the helpful (essential) narrative/guidance you get in the
> published ISO standard.
>
>
>
> BTW I wasn't aware the final version was available for procurement yet. I
> know it's not far away (i.e. TC211 has finished with it, so it's in the ISO
> publishing stage).
>
>
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
> On 25 September 2015 at 05:17, Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com> wrote:
>
> Could Richard maybe specify what this international consensus is? I see
> that I need to pay CHF 58 to read the document…
>
>
>
> Makx.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* richard.murcott@gmail.com [mailto:richard.murcott@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 24 September 2015 11:03
> *To:* Pano Maria <pano.maria@taxonic.com>
> *Cc:* public-locadd@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: Distinguishing between types of address (locn)
>
>
>
> I don't know what "Core Location Vocabulary" is.
>
>
>
> However,
>
> New Zealand has been paying close attention to the development of ISO
> 19160-1:2015
> <http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=61710>
> ( my understanding is that this is already at Stage 60..00 - International
> Standard under publication ).
>
> The standard provides an international consensus on a model/approach to
> 'distinguish between different types of address'. An innovation of the
> standard is to cater the specification of classes of address.
>
> New Zealand, like other jurisdictions participating in ISO/TC211
> <http://www.isotc211.org>, is creating a conforming Profile of this new
> standard to articulate NZ's address characteristics.
>
>
>
> Richard
>
>
> Richard Murcott   |   M +64 27 2243 041
>
>
>
> On 24 September 2015 at 01:26, Pano Maria <pano.maria@taxonic.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I have a question that I’m struggling with. How can I distinguish between
> different types of addresses?
>
> Say a person has a home address and a postal address that are distinct.
> Same could go for a company
>
> That has a postal address and a registration address..
>
> Is there a standard or agreed upon way to express this using the Core
> Location Vocabulary?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Pano
>
>
>
>
>