RE: Distinguishing between types of address (locn)

Ø  I don’t think this group can require its members to pay a fee to get access to relevant information


Are all your journal subscriptions free? ISO’s paywall isn’t really any different to that. I agree that it would be nice if it was free, but its not the only paywall, and somehow it is perceived differently.

From: Makx Dekkers [mailto:mail@makxdekkers.com]
Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 9:39 AM
To: richard.murcott@gmail.com
Cc: 'Pano Maria' <pano.maria@taxonic.com>; public-locadd@w3.org
Subject: RE: Distinguishing between types of address (locn)

Dear all,

If there is an ‘international consensus’ that resolves a problem that was raised here, that consensus should be out in the open. If it’s not, it should not be part of this discussion.

I don’t think this group can require its members to pay a fee to get access to relevant information. If it does, I’ll sign off.

Makx.

From: richard.murcott@gmail.com<mailto:richard.murcott@gmail.com> [mailto:richard.murcott@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 September 2015 04:13
To: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com<mailto:mail@makxdekkers.com>>
Cc: Pano Maria <pano.maria@taxonic.com<mailto:pano.maria@taxonic.com>>; public-locadd@w3.org<mailto:public-locadd@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Distinguishing between types of address (locn)

Re: Could Richard maybe specify what this international consensus is?

It's 65pp with UML models and explanatory narrative. Would be a great investment Makx i.e. save time, get everyone singing from the same songbook. Just sorting out the semantics for the elements/characteristics of address is a coup. A lot of significant entities participated in developing this consensus, including the Universal Postal Union (UPU).

Jurisdictions are publishing conforming Profiles and making these freely accessible. However, each will conform to selected parts of the ISO consensus; parts relevant to their jurisdiction address schemes. Besides, Profiles inherit ISO patterns by referencing the ISO model, so likely a reader would still need the published ISO narrative to round out comprehension of a Profile.

It is possible to access models from the ISO/TC211 model repository<http://www.isotc211.org/hmmg/HTML/root.html>, but the models (typically) are devoid of the helpful (essential) narrative/guidance you get in the published ISO standard.

BTW I wasn't aware the final version was available for procurement yet. I know it's not far away (i.e. TC211 has finished with it, so it's in the ISO publishing stage).

Richard


On 25 September 2015 at 05:17, Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com<mailto:mail@makxdekkers.com>> wrote:
Could Richard maybe specify what this international consensus is? I see that I need to pay CHF 58 to read the document…

Makx.


From: richard.murcott@gmail.com<mailto:richard.murcott@gmail.com> [mailto:richard.murcott@gmail.com<mailto:richard.murcott@gmail.com>]
Sent: 24 September 2015 11:03
To: Pano Maria <pano.maria@taxonic.com<mailto:pano.maria@taxonic.com>>
Cc: public-locadd@w3.org<mailto:public-locadd@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Distinguishing between types of address (locn)

I don't know what "Core Location Vocabulary" is.

However,
New Zealand has been paying close attention to the development of ISO 19160-1:2015<http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=61710> ( my understanding is that this is already at Stage 60..00 - International Standard under publication ).
The standard provides an international consensus on a model/approach to 'distinguish between different types of address'. An innovation of the standard is to cater the specification of classes of address.
New Zealand, like other jurisdictions participating in ISO/TC211<http://www.isotc211.org>, is creating a conforming Profile of this new standard to articulate NZ's address characteristics.

Richard

Richard Murcott   |   M +64 27 2243 041

On 24 September 2015 at 01:26, Pano Maria <pano.maria@taxonic.com<mailto:pano.maria@taxonic.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

I have a question that I’m struggling with. How can I distinguish between different types of addresses?
Say a person has a home address and a postal address that are distinct. Same could go for a company
That has a postal address and a registration address..
Is there a standard or agreed upon way to express this using the Core Location Vocabulary?
Thanks in advance!

Kind regards,
Pano