- From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:43:58 +0100
- To: Cristiano Longo <cristianolongo@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-locadd@w3.org Mailing list" <public-locadd@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFVDz40yUxBKWW7VaNuZM0H_W7ud3y_FffiPZu11g4Ayt9strw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Cristiano, I am not sure about the diagram, but I would say that the resource in that diagram does not need to be the same resource. For me a logical way of modelling would be to say that pharmacies are instances of the dctemrs:Location class and are related to address and/or geometry resources (instances of locn:Geometry and locn:Address). The properties locn:geometry and locn:address can be used to link a pharmacy to geometries and/or addresses. The locn:location property could be used to link other resources to pharmacies as locations. Regards, Frans 2015-11-10 11:33 GMT+01:00 Cristiano Longo <cristianolongo@gmail.com>: > Hi all, > I need to say that an organization (a pharmacy in particular) is located > at an address and at the specified lat/lon coordinates, but I'm a bit > confused. In the w3c ISA Programme Location Core Vocabulary description ( > http://www.w3.org/ns/locn) there is a diagram in Section Vocabulary Terms > at a Glance showing a resource (the pharmacy in my case?) is directly > linked with the Location, the Address and the Geometry. But, in the joinup > web site I found another diagram showing that the Location instance is > linked with Geometry and Address > > > http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/site/core_vocabularies/Core_Vocabularies_v1.1/Core_Vocabularies_v1.1.htm > . > > Currently, I'm using the latter modelling. Thus I have a Pharmacy > instance linked with a Location one via the location property, and the > Location instance linked with an Address and a Geomerty one. Do I am right? > > Thank you in advance, > Cristiano Longo >
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2015 11:44:30 UTC