- From: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:01:47 +0000 (UTC)
- To: <public-locadd@w3.org>, Cristiano Longo <cristianolongo@gmail.com>
(sorry locadd, my Yahoo mail has "technical troubles", I apologize if this gets posted 3 times) Hi Cristiano, The linking scheme you use has a basis variable (Space), the other (Time). There is no "right" answer, but the wrong answer is to fail to note that in your documentation. This might entice a future user of your data set to commit the Reification fallacy[1]. Messing with future modelers' model is not nice. --Gannon [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reification_%28fallacy%29 -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 11/10/15, Cristiano Longo <cristianolongo@gmail.com> wrote: Subject: How to link address and geometry to the object located there To: public-locadd@w3.org Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015, 4:33 AM Hi all, I need to say that an organization (a pharmacy in particular) is located at an address and at the specified lat/lon coordinates, but I'm a bit confused. In the w3c ISA Programme Location Core Vocabulary description (http://www.w3.org/ns/locn) there is a diagram in Section Vocabulary Terms at a Glance showing a resource (the pharmacy in my case?) is directly linked with the Location, the Address and the Geometry. But, in the joinup web site I found another diagram showing that the Location instance is linked with Geometry and Address http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/site/core_vocabularies/Core_Vocabularies_v1.1/Core_Vocabularies_v1.1.htm . Currently, I'm using the latter modelling. Thus I have a Pharmacy instance linked with a Location one via the location property, and the Location instance linked with an Address and a Geomerty one. Do I am right? Thank you in advance, Cristiano Longo
Received on Tuesday, 10 November 2015 18:02:17 UTC