- From: jon richter. geosemantik. <post@jonrichter.de>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 15:56:44 +0200
- To: "Frans Knibbe | Geodan" <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Cc: "public-locadd@w3.org Mailing list" <public-locadd@w3.org>
TL;DR This post is not straight on the point, but displays my personal associations to the topic. Hallo Frans, I feel a little intruiged by the coincidence that you are asking about time now only a few weeks after I joined this list. Why that? Because I've entered mainly to answer myself questions regarding spacetime relations. I have the strong feeling, esp. for my research on knowledge visualization and tempospatial patterns therein, that a more thorough investigation and understanding of time itself can help representing, in my case, distributed processes in a more meaningful manner. --- I'm just starting to explore this topic for me, as there are only scattered notes, but to merge everything I find right now they are: * levels of measurement * probability / discrete / continuous ( wiki://Quantum_spacetime ) * geogit * ActiveRecord's tempospatial engine * WIK DVCS - patch-based version control for the Federated Wiki ( including Transclusion, etc. ) * SMILIE Timemap, Sextant, OKFn Timemapper There is work I know on those issues, mostly derived from the conferences I attended this year, since I just started exploring: [ via CartoCon 2014 ] * tempospatial reasoning - https://people.aalto.fi/index.html?profilepage=isfor#!andreas_hall * Barend Köbben's work - http://kartoweb.itc.nl/kobben/ - check Showcase > D3 examples * tempospatial models in PostGIS - via Raimund Schnürer - http://www.ikg.ethz.ch/karto/people/staff/sraimund [via FOSSGIS 2014 ] * Time Slices ( AIXM related ) - http://www.fossgis.de/konferenz/2014/programm/events/745.de.html * tempospatial models in GRASS ( via OSGeo ) [ via OuiShare Fest 2014 / Harry Halpin ] * Linked Geodata Activist Phil Archer which I still have to contact. * A Catalog of Temporal Theories - by Pat Hayes - http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/docs/timeCatalog.pdf [ #lgd14 was also a very resourceful event, but I haven't been there ] * Strabon as a semantic tempospatial engine designed from ground up http://www.archaeogeomancy.net/2014/03/linking-geospatial-data/ I think I will be filing in a paper for #geold14 / http://geold.geoknow.eu/ discussing * existing time-space ontologies * relation to geojson-ld * calendar / timezone agnostic time --- All this becomes important when I want to draw distributed processes [ persons, organizations, projects, knowledges, resources, ... ] along topological, temporal or spatial scales. Outside of the technological interest, the philosophical implications also appear interesting: * How can a non-linear time-model serve a processual democracy? * Do we already understand time enough to use historic prepositions for time modelling? Sorry for being so scetchy, but I'm just a beginner in this topic. But maybe I'm following a good trail here? Interested in any further exchange, Jon 2014-05-23 12:39 GMT+02:00 Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>: > Hello, > > When reading and talking about geographical Linked Data I sometimes come > across the term 'spatiotemporal data', meaning that data are dependent on > both space and time. I wonder if temporal aspects of data should be > considered when we are thinking about how to express location data in the > Semantic Web. > > I understand that for many spatial data the temporal aspects are really > important, but I think temporal aspects could be equally important to data > about postage stamps or model trains or beer, or whichever other topics one > can have data about. In all cases, I don't think it is necessary to think of > special ways of expressing the time dimension in the data. It seems to me > that general vocabularies and/or data types for expressing time should > suffice. In other words, I think that time and space are orthogonal subjects > and that vocabularies about space (location) can be kept separate from > vocabularies about time (For normal everyday data, that is. Cosmological > data are another matter). > > What do you think about this? > > Regards, > Frans > > > ________________________________ > Frans Knibbe > Geodan > President Kennedylaan 1 > 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) > > T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 > E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl > www.geodan.nl | disclaimer > ________________________________
Received on Monday, 26 May 2014 14:24:11 UTC