- From: Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 15:54:56 +0200
- To: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>, "public-locadd@w3.org" <public-locadd@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <539B02B0.9030500@geodan.nl>
On 2014-06-04 21:35, Gannon Dick wrote: > 2) The order of location designators. This issue was already discussed in a previous thread, but perhaps it helps to have some real data to play around with. The second query above returns addresses with multiple locatorDesignators. For example, "12" and "B". The order is important, 12B is the right order. But how can an agent that only knows about LOCN know the right order? Is a change to LOCN needed ? Or are there other ways to solve this problem? > > > Hi Frans, > > Please pardon my dinosaur footprints :-) > > US Customs uses a "Manufacturer ID" address shortening procedure. http://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/documents/3550-055_3.pdf > > I imagine The Kingdom of the Netherlands has something similar > > These old procedures may be worth a look because they were developed in collaboration with industry back before personal privacy was an issue. The confidentiality of business information was the only concern. Interesting. Do they still use the same procedure? I imagine those codes will not always be unique, but perhaps that is not a problem. This got me thinking: 1) If one of the goals of Location Core is to harmonize worldwide addresses, perhaps it is a good idea to consider having something like an address template. The various bits that can define an address are already there, but in order to build an address that could be used in mail traffic for instance, one needs to know about the order in which address components should be placed. For the Netherlands that would be something like <thoroughfare> <locator designator (first level)> {locator designator (second level)} {locator designator (third level)} <postCode> <postName> <adminUnitL1> Could it be that something like this exists somewhere? I don't believe such a thing is part of the INSPIRE specifications. 2) Given that it is hard to construct a mail address from the raw data in my data set, perhaps I could add some extra convenience triples that will have the full post address as literals. I could make use of locn:fullAddress for that. I wonder if there are examples or best practices of locn:fullAddress... Would it make sense to use HMTL tags for formatting? > --Gannon > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Frans Knibbe Geodan President Kennedylaan 1 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 13:59:08 UTC